A very interesting thing happened tonight. My 13 year old daughter was logged into a Moodle account being used by the school district. Her English class added a course to the system and the kids were introduced to the system today.
I was impressed to see the school district using a tool like Moodle to help manage courses, but was more impressed when I saw HOW they were using it, WHAT the kids were saying, and how QUICKLY it was adopted.
Since her class just started on this today, there was only item in the system: a forum discussion topic for the book Flowers for Algernon. The teacher started the discussion with “Should doctors tamper with intelligence?” While this topic only started today, and the kids were only exposed to this tool for the first time today, there are already close to 40 posts on the topic. Not only is the number impressive, but the quality of the posts is amazing. From logical analogies using cancer and smoking as instantiations, to discussing the interpretation of “tamper”, to debating if a possible patient could make a competent decision for themselves, and the social impact if doctors were able and allowed to tamper with intelligence, it was amazing to see the quality of thoughts and ideas.
I have been impressed before with how much better kids seem to collaborate on projects in the classroom than we often do in the workplace. This time I was impressed by the level and quality of independent thought being expressed. The kids also quickly adopted a new technology to them, and will learn a great deal more through this online debate and exchange of ideas.
If this small sample is any indication, we have an impressive generation learning to discuss and debate topics using online forums at an early age. I’m excited to see what this generation brings to the world.
4 comments - add yoursI’ve been thinking about Twitter a lot lately, trying to better understand it and explain it to others. Very often I hear people that don’t use Twitter saying “I don’t get it.” I usually tell them it is like instant messaging, except you are IM’ing to the world and you can choose who you listen to. The next question is usually a variant of how or why do people use Twitter.
I’m starting to classify the different types of Twitter users based usage patterns. Here’s what I’ve got so far:
People don’t typically stay confined to one of these roles. We are all human and have the right to change! If I’m at a sporting event, I’m typically a play by play announcer, and sometimes provide color commentary. When I’m tweeting from work, I’m more color commentary and some diarist. During home time, I’m predominantly a diarist.
So, how do YOU use Twitter?
1 comment - add yours